Bitcoin: A Unique Risk-Off Asset?

Summary Because of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, trust in governments and financial institutions has waned. While traditional risk-off assets are likely to play a role in portfolio construction, their limitations are giving investors reason to reassess so-called risk-off assets. Bitcoin offers an interesting paradox: enabled by its groundbreaking technological underpinnings, it can act as an effective hedge against economic uncertainty, potentially resulting in exponential growth. By Yassine Elmandjra, Director of Digital Assets Because of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, trust in governments and financial institutions has waned. Since then, events like the European Sovereign Debt Crisis, the U.S. Federal Reserve’s response to COVID19, and the collapse of major US regional banks have exposed the pitfalls of relying on centrally controlled institutions. Along with the accelerated impact of technological innovation, this deterioration in trust has called into question the effectiveness of traditional risk-off assets in protecting modern portfolios. Are government bonds less risky in the wake of events like the European Sovereign Debt Crisis? Is physical gold less effective as a hedge in a digital economy? Will inconsistent Fed policies threaten the dollar’s role as a reserve currency? While traditional risk-off assets are likely to play a role in portfolio construction, their limitations are giving investors reason to reassess so-called risk-off assets. While the “risk-on” versus “risk-off” characteristics of traditional assets are mutually exclusive, Bitcoin has introduced a paradigm that is challenging that distinction. Its revolutionary technology and nascency are risk-on, while, as a monetary asset, its absolute scarcity and role as a "bearer instrument” 1 are risk-off—thus blurring the traditional distinction. Bitcoin offers an interesting paradox: enabled by its groundbreaking technological underpinnings, it can act as an effective hedge against economic uncertainty, potentially resulting in exponential growth. Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Created in response to the Global Financial Crisis in 2008, Bitcoin has evolved from a fringe technology to a new asset class worthy of institutional allocation. As the network matures, asset allocators are likely to evaluate seriously bitcoin’s merit as a risk-off asset. Bitcoin As A Risk-Off Asset While its explosive growth and price volatility have led many investors and asset allocators to deem bitcoin the epitome of a risk-on asset, we believe that the Bitcoin network embodies risk-off characteristics that enable financial sovereignty, reduce counterparty risk, and enhance transparency. Bitcoin is the first digital, independent, global, rules-based monetary system in history. By design, its decentralization should mitigate the systemic risks associated with traditional financial systems that rely on centralized intermediaries and human decision makers to dictate and enforce rules. Capital “B” Bitcoin is the financial network that facilitates the transfer and custody of lowercase “b” bitcoin, a scarce digital monetary asset. Based on its core attributes, we believe bitcoin is the purest form of money ever created. It is: • A digital bearer asset similar to a commodity. • A scarce, liquid, divisible, portable, transferable, and fungible asset. • An auditable and transparent asset. • An asset that can be fully matched by equity and custodied without liability or counterparty risk. Importantly, bitcoin’s properties are native to the Bitcoin network, which runs on open-source software. While many institutions coordinate functions in the traditional financial system, Bitcoin operates as a single institution. Instead of relying on central banks, regulators, and other government decision-makers, Bitcoin relies on a global network of peers to enforce rules, shifting enforcement from manual, private, and opaque to automated, public, and transparent. Given its technological underpinnings, Bitcoin is positioned uniquely relative to traditional risk-off assets, as highlighted below. Risk-Off Attribute Bitcoin Gold Government Bonds Physical Cash Decentralization Fully decentralized, runs on peer-to-peer software, no central authority. Decentralized, but requires highly centralized production, distribution, and storage, given physical nature. Centralized by nature, issued and controlled by governmental entities, subject to arbitrary policy changes and fiscal mismanagement. Transactions can occur without a central authority, but the value and supply are controlled by government. Supply Limitation Strictly scarce, predictable, mathematically metered monetary policy, capped at 21 million coins. Relatively scarce, subject to discoveries of new deposits and advancements in mining technology, making future supply less predictable. Uncapped issuance, which can lead to potential devaluation in times of aggressive fiscal expansion or monetary easing. Unpredictable monetary policy, subject to inflation, and unlimited supply expansion. Portability Digitally native, global, highly portable, infinitely divisible. Physical asset, cumbersome, expensive to secure and transport. Digital in nature, but tied to the traditional financial systems, siloed to specific markets. Physical cash is portable but impractical to carry in large amounts; digital cash requires traditional banking infrastructure. Liquidity Increasingly liquid, with global trading platforms, a regulated futures market, and spot exchange-traded funds. Highly liquid, universally recognized store of value. Highly liquid, but subject to liquidity issues during financial crises and in unstable regions. Highly liquid, universally accepted for transactions. Market Independence Historically low correlation 2 with traditional assets. Historically a safe haven, though can be influenced by market conditions. Sensitive to changes in interest rates and economic outlook. Sensitive to changes in interest rates and economic outlook, vulnerable to inflation. Accessibility Universally accessible to anyone with internet access. Higher barriers to entry, often requires physical storage solutions, trust in third-party custodians, and complex logistical considerations. Restricted by geographic location and investor qualifications. Universally accessible but requires physical handling and storage, subject to capital controls in emerging markets. Security & Transparency Secured by the world's largest computer network; fully auditable and transparent, thanks to blockchain technology. Secured by physical atomic properties. However, auditability and transparency regarding gold’s origins and purity are prohibitively expensive. Subject to the credit risk of the issuing government and rely on traditional financial systems for transparency. Physical cash is subject to theft; digital cash depends on banking security. Counterparty Risk Can be custodied without liability. With effective key management, bitcoin is easy to conceal and protect, difficult to seize or steal when a private key, equivalent to ownership, is held. Less concealable and transportable, can be physically confiscated or stolen with relative ease if not stored securely. Can be frozen or confiscated by governmental authorities as digital records within the traditional financial system. Physical cash is easy to custody in small amounts, but more difficult to custody in large amounts. Subject to theft. Digital cash is subject to traditional bank counterparty risk. Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Bitcoin’s Relative Performance By The Numbers As a nascent asset, bitcoin’s speculative characteristics and short-term volatility have created distractions from its track record. In the last 15 years, bitcoin has scaled to more than $1 trillion in market capitalization, increasing its purchasing power while maintaining its independence. Indeed, over short- and long-term time horizons, bitcoin has outperformed every other major asset class. Over the last 7 years, it has generated annualized returns approaching 60% relative to the 7% on average of other major assets, as shown below. *Asset classes are represented by the following instruments: SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY, equities), Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VBMFX, bonds), Vanguard Real Estate Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VGSIX, real estate), SPDR Gold Trust (GLD, gold), iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust ETF (GSG, commodities), and Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Investor Shares (VEIEX, emerging markets). The performance used to represent each asset class reflects the net asset value (NAV) performance of each ETF/fund for the time periods shown. Sources: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data and calculation from PortfolioVisualizer.com, with bitcoin price data from Glassnode, as of March 31, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Importantly, since its inception, investors who bought and held bitcoin for 5 years have profited, regardless of the timing of their purchases, as shown below. Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from Glassnode as of December 31, 2023. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. In contrast, relative to bitcoin, traditional risk-off assets like gold, bonds, and short-term U.S. Treasuries have lost 99% of their purchasing power over the last decade, as shown below. *The risk-off asset basket herein is composed equal weights the Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VBMFX, bonds), the SPDR Gold Trust (GLD, gold), and the Vanguard Short-Term Treasury Fund Investor Shares (VFISX) . The returns used reflect the net asset value (NAV) performance that are applicable to each fund. In the case of bitcoin, performance does not reflect the deduction of any brokerage or trading fees that may apply. The basket returns are hypothetical and do not represent the performance of an actual portfolio. **Log: Refers to the logarithmic scale, a non-linear scale where each unit of length is a multiple of some base value raised to a power, and corresponds to the multiplication of the previous value in the scale by the base value (10 in this case). Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from PortfolioVisualizer and Glassnode as of March 31, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Is Bitcoin Too Volatile To Qualify As An Asset That Preserves Capital? Paradoxically, bitcoin’s volatility is a function of Bitcoin’s monetary policy, highlighting its credibility as an independent monetary system. Unlike modern central banking, Bitcoin does not prioritize price or exchange-rate stability. Instead, by controlling bitcoin’s supply growth, the Bitcoin network prioritizes the free flow of capital. As a result, bitcoin’s price is a function of demand relative to its supply - explaining its volatility. That said, bitcoin’s price volatility has diminished over time, as shown below: Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from Glassnode as of March 31, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Why has bitcoin’s price volatility declined over time? As its adoption has increased, the marginal demand for bitcoin has diminished relative to its total network value, lowering the magnitude of its price swings. All else equal, $1 billion in new demand on a network value of $10 billion should impact bitcoin’s price more significantly than $1 billion on a $1 trillion network value. Importantly, volatility in the context of a significant uptrend in price should not preclude bitcoin’s role as a store of value. Perhaps a more relevant metric showcasing bitcoin’s role in preserving capital and purchasing power is its market cost basis. While market capitalization aggregates the value of all bitcoin in circulation at current prices, the market cost basis - or realized capitalization - values each bitcoin at the price of its last movement. The cost basis can be a more accurate measurement of changes in purchasing power. Fluctuations in the cost basis are less pronounced than fluctuations in price, as shown below. For example, while Bitcoin’s market capitalization drew down ~77% from November 2021 to November 2022, its cost basis drew down only 18.5%. Today, Bitcoin’s cost basis is trading at an all-time high, 20% above its market peak in 2021. Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from Glassnode as of March 31, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Bitcoin’s Independence From Other Asset Classes Low Correlations Another indication of bitcoin’s suitability as a risk-off asset is the low correlation of its returns to those of other asset classes. Bitcoin is one of the few assets with consistently low correlations, as shown below. Between 2018 and 2023, the correlation of bitcoin’s returns relative to traditional asset classes has averaged only 0.27. Importantly, the correlation between bonds and gold— traditionally considered defensive asset classes—is relatively high at 0.46, while the correlation of bitcoin’s returns to those of gold and bonds are 0.2 and 0.26, respectively. 1A correlation of 1 denotes that assets move in tandem perfectly; A correlation of 0 denotes that the movement of two variables is completely independent; A correlation of -1denotes that two variables move in opposite directions. 2Asset classes are represented by the following instruments: SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY, equities), Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VBMFX, bonds), Vanguard Real Estate Market Index Fund Investor Shares (VGSIX, real estate), SPDR Gold Trust (GLD, gold), iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust ETF (GSG, commodities), and Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund Investor Shares (VEIEX, emerging markets). The performance used to represent each asset class reflects the net asset value (NAV) performance of each ETF/fund for the time periods shown. Sources: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data and calculation from PortfolioVisualizer.com, with bitcoin price data from Glassnode, as of December 31, 2023. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Resilience To Changing Interest Rate Regimes Moreover, a comparison of bitcoin’s price with the Fed Funds Rate 3 illustrates its resilience in different interest rate and economic environments, as shown below. Importantly, in both high and low interest rate regimes, bitcoin’s price has appreciated significantly, as shown below. Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from FRED and Glassnode as of March 31, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. During the past ten years, the price of bitcoin has held up well during risk-off periods. As of this writing, its price is higher now than at every one of those risk-off events, as shown below. Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from Glassnode as of March 31, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Bitcoin’s response to the regional bank crisis is a notable example. In early 2023, during the historic collapse of US regional banks, bitcoin’s price appreciated more than 40%, highlighting its role as a hedge against counterparty risk, as shown below. Sources: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from Bloomberg and Glassnode as of December 31, 2023. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. While bitcoin has suffered drawdowns, its notable setbacks have been industry-specific, or idiosyncratic. Among them were the Mt. Gox exchange hacks in 2014, the leveraged initial coin offering (ICO) bubble in 2017, and the fraud-related collapse of FTX in 2022. Through each of those cyclical drawdowns, bitcoin proved its antifragility with resilience and a price resolution to the upside. Looking Ahead In its short history, bitcoin has earned important but underappreciated stripes as a risk-off asset. As the global economy continues to shift from physical toward digital activity, the use of Bitcoin’s global decentralized monetary system should continue to increase, potentially setting bitcoin up to rival traditional risk-off assets. Increasing the odds are recent events like the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US, the adoption of bitcoin as legal tender in nation-states like El Salvador, and allocations to bitcoin in corporate treasuries like Block, Microstrategy, and Tesla. With bitcoin at ~$1.3 trillion and fixed-income assets at $130 trillion, global risk-off assets seem ripe for disruption. Global M2: Estimate of the total money supply, including all cash on hand, as well as money deposited in checking accounts, savings accounts, and other short-term saving vehicles such as certificates of deposit (CDs). Source: ARK Investment Management LLC, 2024, based on data from Glassnode, VisualCapitalist, Statista, Macromicro.me, and Companiesmarketcap.com, as of March 31, 2024. For informational purposes only and should not be considered investment advice or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any particular security or cryptocurrency. Past performance is not indicative of future results. 1 A “bearer instrument” in this context is an asset whose physical possession confers ownership. Also known as a “bearer asset”: physical possession establishes ownership. 2 “Correlation”: The statistical relationship between two variables. A correlation of 1 denotes that assets move in tandem perfectly; A correlation of 0 denotes that the movement of two variables is completely independent; A correlation of -1 denotes that two variables they move in opposite directions. 3 The Fed Funds Rate: The federal funds market consists of domestic unsecured borrowings in U.S. dollars by depository institutions from other depository institutions and certain other entities, primarily government-sponsored enterprises. The effective federal funds rate (EFFR) is calculated as a volume-weighted median of overnight federal funds transactions reported in the FR 2420 Report of Selected Money Market Rates. ARK's statements are not an endorsement of any company or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security. For a list of all purchases and sales made by ARK for client accounts during the past year that could be considered by the SEC as recommendations, click here . It should not be assumed that recommendations made in the future will be profitable or will equal the performance of the securities in this list. For full disclosures, click here . ©2021-2026, ARK Investment Management LLC (“ARK” ® ”ARK Invest”). All content is original and has been researched and produced by ARK unless otherwise stated. No part of ARK’s original content may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without the express written permission of ARK. The content is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice or an offer or solicitation in respect to any products or services for any persons who are prohibited from receiving such information under the laws applicable to their place of citizenship, domicile or residence. Certain of the statements contained on this website may be statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on ARK's current views and assumptions, and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. All content is subject to change without notice. All statements made regarding companies or securities or other financial information on this site or any sites relating to ARK are strictly beliefs and points of view held by ARK or the third party making such statement and are not endorsements by ARK of any company or security or recommendations by ARK to buy, sell or hold any security. The content presented does not constitute investment advice, should not be used as the basis for any investment decision, and does not purport to provide any legal, tax or accounting advice. Please remember that there are inherent risks involved with investing in the markets, and your investments may be worth more or less than your initial investment upon redemption. There is no guarantee that ARK's objectives will be achieved. Further, there is no assurance that any strategies, methods, sectors, or any investment programs herein were or will prove to be profitable, or that any investment recommendations or decisions we make in the future will be profitable for any investor or client. Professional money management is not suitable for all investors. For full disclosures, please go to our Terms & Conditions page. The Adviser did not pay a fee to be considered for or granted the awards. The Adviser did not pay any fee to the grantor of the awards for the right to promote the Adviser's receipt of the awards nor was the Adviser required to be a member of an organization to be eligible for the awards. For full Award Disclosure please go to our Terms & Conditions page. Past performance is not indicative of future performance.